DREU ‘24 Project Idea Brainstorm

DREU ‘24 Project Idea Brainstorm

Data

  • Readily available user-reported phishing emails from U Utah
    • Take into account bias of sample (i.e., these are user-reported)
    • What can be done with these phishing emails? (backwards way to think about it?)
      • Studying emails qualitatively may say something interesting about the kind of phishing campaigns/attempts that are noticeable to ordinary users
    • Potentially augment with collected data on attitudes towards phishing + experiments observing people who are under the impression they are being actively phished?
      • Need to flesh out idea before jumping on data to test hypotheses

Ideas

  • CAPTCHA usability
    • Suggested by Sameer
  • Social engineering studies
    • Something based on phishing
      • Generalized phishing
      • Spearphishing
      • Note: keep ethics in mind, tricky to study
    • Insider threats in organizational security
      • Difficult to study :(
  • Authentication mechanism usability
    • Password usability (probably overdone)
    • Passkey usability
      • Do security keys enhance or weaken security given that users must protect physical access to their devices?
    • SSO/OAuth usability
    • MFA usability
  • User attitudes towards importance of (web) privacy
    • Overdone?
    • Social media privacy
      • Importance of being anonymous online?
    • Cookie usage / consent
    • Opinions on tracking / surveillance
      • Awareness of fingerprinting (specifically browser fingerprinting)
      • Feelings about targeted advertising
  • Something with fingerprint / face as authentication mechanism
  • Perceived security / privacy across environments and devices
    • Confidence in email security
    • E.g. do you feel more secure browsing a desktop on a home network than a phone on a cellular network? etc
  • Something on open source intelligence
  • eConsent
    • How expectations vary between physical and virtual agreements?
      • Users are “forced” into accepting privacy agreements for third party applications they wish to use… potentially conditions them into exercising less scrutiny when reviewing online terms/agreements?